IPA (2021 – 2022) Match 3 Recap
Overview
The IPA 2021–2022 tournament resumed with Match 3 on January 14 and 15.
Columbia Law, Cornell and Georgia Tech continue to extend their leads with consistent performances. Cornell and Georgia Tech dominate their groups, while Auckland improves significantly from last to third as the team fights for Kiwi representation in the postseason.
UNSW continues to lead Group A, arguably the most closely matched group. The spread from first to last place is only 12 points, and the standard deviation of 4.38 points is the lowest of any group. Auckland and UC Davis trade momentum, with Auckland now in third and UC Davis in last. The fight for playoff seats continues, and the wildcard spot is within any team’s grasp.
In Group B, Columbia Law and Manchester move up to claim first and second. Michigan is a quarter point away from a playoff seat, and William & Mary drops from its early lead to fourth but remains in contention.
In Group C, Illinois recovers major ground after a poor Match 2 and now sits in third, edging out McGill and Yale. Match 4 will give a clearer picture of which of these three teams will claim the wildcard spot and possibly a playoff spot. Claremont McKenna improves to first.
Group D sees a few position swaps. Indiana and Princeton trade third and fourth place, and Boston University and Northeastern trade sixth and seventh. Georgia Tech keeps its lead with a healthy margin.
Group E sees close results among the top four teams. Vanderbilt, UPenn, Waterloo and Tufts all need strong results in their last two matches, with only five points separating them.
In Group F, reigning IPA champion Brown again regains lost ground, improving from third to second. UMass put up a strong performance and won Match 3, while Cornell dominates the group and extends its lead over second place.
Notable Hands
Group C, Table 1, Hand 58 (8/40/80)
Chris Madison (Booth), James Leung (Yale), Tasha Liang (McGill)
Liang (4846 | SB) Madison (5740 | BB) Leung (3414 | BTN)
Leung raises to 220
Liang and Madison call 220
Flop: 8♠ 4♥ 8♦
Liang checks
Madison bets 325
Leung folds
Liang calls 325
Turn: 8♠ 4♥ 8♦ [9♦]
Liang checks
Madison checks
River: 8♠ 4♥ 8♦ 9♦ [10♥]
Madison bets 425
Liang raises to 905
Madison folds
Liang wins the pot of 2,160 chips with 8♥ 8♣.
Group B, Table 2, Hand 26 (4/20/40)
Kiril Voynishki (Manchester), Jarvis Bereday (William & Mary), Jeffrey Xu (Harvard), Xyzlo Lee (Columbia Law), Jacob Fain (Wesleyan), Joshua Bay (Michigan)
Bay (1843 | SB) Voynishki (1875 | BB) Bereday (1206 | UTG) Xu (1680 | UTG+1) Lee (2798 | CO) Fain (2598 | BTN)
Folds to Lee who raises to 80
Fain raises to 245
Bay and Voynishki fold
Lee calls 245
Flop: 3♣ 6♥ 9♥
Lee checks
Fain bets 275
Lee raises to 670
Fain calls 670
Turn: 3♣ 6♥ 9♥ [4♦]
Lee checks
Fain checks
River: 3♣ 6♥ 9♥ 4♦ [3♦]
Lee bets 1683 and goes all in
Fain folds
Lee wins the pot of 1,890 chips and shows 2♠ A♠. Fain shows 6♣ 8♣.
Group D, Table 4, Hand 37 (4/20/40)
Nicholas Goei (Indiana), Will Rumble (Oxford), Anthony Porco (BU), Alan Chao (Northwestern), Florian Pesce (Georgia Tech), Qinghua Liu (Princeton)
Pesce (2885 | SB) Liu (2727 | BB) Goei (1817 | UTG) Rumble (1745 | UTG+1) Porco (807 | CO) Chao (2019 | BTN)
Folds to Pesce who calls 40
Liu raises to 100
Pesce raises to 360
Liu raises to 720
Flop: 9♥ 3♦ 8♦
Pesce checks
Liu bets 692
Pesce calls 692
Turn: 9♥ 3♦ 8♦ [6♣]
Pesce checks
Liu checks
River: 9♥ 3♦ 8♦ 6♣ [10♠]
Pesce bets 1311 and goes all in
Liu calls and goes all in
Pesce (A♦ A♥) Liu (6♥ A♣)
Pesce wins the pot of 5,470 chips.
Group D, Table 1, Hand 67 (6/30/60)
Sarina Ku (Northwestern), George Yao (Princeton), Socrates Raftis (Indiana), Jonathan Tam (Oxford), Maxwell Guo (Georgia Tech)
Guo (2859 | SB) Ku (2762 | BB) Yao (1617 | UTG) Raftis (3010 | CO) Tam (1752 | BTN)
Yao raises to 135
Raftis folds
Tam calls 135
Guo raises to 2756 and goes all in
Ku calls and goes all in
Yao and Tam fold
Ku (K♣ K♠) Guo (J♠ Q♠)
Flop: 5♠ 6♠ 4♠
Turn: 5♠ 6♠ 4♠ [5♥]
River: 5♠ 6♠ 4♠ 5♥ [8♣]
Guo wins the pot of 5,812 chips.
Christmas came early. The big stacks woke up and decided to go to war, and it got ugly.
Jonathan Tam
January’s Table Leaders
Saabiq Ali (UNSW), Fred Baldwin (Michigan), Isaac Blue (UPenn), Hu Chen (Sydney), Matthew Cooney (York), Alexander Dranoff (Indiana), Chris Fang (Waterloo), Luke Gastelu (Cornell), Aidan Gomar (McGill), Jake Green (Illinois), Felix Hayes-Tourelle (Auckland), Toby Hirsch (UPenn), Eric Lasry (Oxford), Tasha Liang (McGill), Beckham Lie (USC), Kyle McCormack (Victoria), Florian Pesce (Georgia Tech), Shane Pike (Illinois), Jonathan Pry (Columbia Law), William Rodliffe (Manchester), Diart Spahija (UMass), Joshua Stotzky (Vanderbilt), Jonathan Tam (Oxford), Albie Vock (Manchester), Kiril Voynishki (Manchester), Robbie Wilson (Edinburgh), Shuto Yasuda (UBC), Xinyi Zheng (Princeton), Jason Zhou (UMass), Cottrell van Wingerden (Brown)
Group A
| Team | Points | Match 3 | Change |
UNSW | 66 | 20 | No change |
Pomona | 65.75 | 25 | ↑+3 |
| 61.25 | 28.75 | ↑+4 | |
USC | 58 | 17 | No change |
Victoria | 58 | 16 | ↓-2 |
Sydney | 55.5 | 20.5 | No change |
UC Davis | 54 | 12 | ↓-5 |
Group B
| Team | Points | Match 3 | Change |
Columbia Law | 72 | 26 | ↑+1 |
Manchester | 70 | 27 | ↑+2 |
Michigan | 69.75 | 25 | No change |
| William & Mary | 66 | 17 | ↓-3 |
Wesleyan | 56 | 19 | No change |
Harvard | 48 | 13 | No change |
Georgetown | 38 | 13 | No change |
Group C
| Team | Points | Match 3 | Change |
Claremont McKenna | 69 | 22 | ↑+1 |
Washington University | 64.5 | 15.5 | ↓-1 |
Illinois | 61.25 | 24 | ↑+3 |
| 61 | 22 | ↑+1 | |
Yale | 60 | 20 | ↓-2 |
York | 57.75 | 18 | ↓-2 |
Chicago Booth | 45 | 18 | No change |
Group D
| Team | Points | Match 3 | Change |
Georgia Tech | 76 | 27 | No change |
| 69 | 26 | No change | |
Indiana | 64.25 | 24.75 | ↑+1 |
Princeton | 62 | 22 | ↓-1 |
Northwestern | 55 | 18 | No change |
Boston University | 50.75 | 15.75 | ↑+1 |
Northeastern | 42 | 6 | ↓-1 |
Group E
| Team | Points | Match 3 | Change |
Vanderbilt | 64 | 18 | No change |
UPenn | 62.5 | 26 | ↑+2 |
Waterloo | 61.75 | 17 | ↓-1 |
Tufts | 59 | 16 | ↓-1 |
UC San Diego | 38.5 | 14 | No change |
Edinburgh | 29.25 | 14.75 | No change |
Group F
| Team | Points | Match 3 | Change |
Cornell | 75 | 24 | No change |
Brown | 67 | 21 | ↑+1 |
Miami | 61.75 | 12.75 | ↓-1 |
Harvey Mudd | 60 | 21 | ↑+1 |
Imperial | 60 | 17 | ↓-1 |
British Columbia | 50 | 18 | No change |
UMass | 44.75 | 25.5 | No change |
Updates
There are three changes to the current rules and one change to the relegation system. The rule changes apply from Match 4 onward, and the relegation change also applies to past results. The updated rules are on the Format & Rules (2021 – 2022) page.
The IPA tournament will resume on February 4 and 5, 2022.
UNSW
Pomona
USC
Victoria
Sydney
UC Davis
Columbia Law
Manchester
Michigan
Wesleyan
Harvard
Georgetown
Claremont McKenna
Washington University
Illinois
Yale
York
Chicago Booth
Georgia Tech
Indiana
Princeton
Northwestern
Boston University
Northeastern
Vanderbilt
UPenn
Waterloo
Tufts
UC San Diego
Edinburgh
Cornell
Brown
Miami
Harvey Mudd
Imperial
British Columbia
UMass